El 6to Estado - En Espanol

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

The double standards of Islam

Islamists sure know how to push our buttons and work the sympathies of the western press. Their guilt is expressed through cutting themselves with swords and whipping themselves with chains until bloody; our guilt is spread across the front pages.

It doesn't matter if the article in Newsweek claiming U.S. interrogators flushed a copy of the Koran is true or not. The radical Islam propaganda machine is working overtime. Just about any excuse will do -- except one that has merit. Newsweek's recent report was just handy is all.

It's interesting that Newsweek is taking, and the administration is giving it, credit for the riots. The magazine was in distribution for four days before the riots started. The riots were alleged by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. senior military commander on the ground in Afghanistan to be a result of the country's reconciliation process, not the Newsweek report. Now, the propagandists, taking their lead from the guilt-ridden western press, have accepted the Koran flushing as the handy excuse.

It's amazing how much people in the west bend over backwards trying to accommodate the cultural sensitivities of offended radical Muslims. We're culturally sensitive to people who allow radical mullahs to teach children that the only good unbeliever is a dead unbeliever and that the suicidal bombing of their women, elderly and children is acceptable. Afghanis don't demonstrate when some al Qaeda bombers in Iraq kill innocents at the opening of a waterworks or in a public market, or when Ba'athists behead aid workers, but they're incensed about a report about some wet paper. Go figure.

And we're worried about hurting the religious sensitivities of people who blow up 1,700 year old Buddhas. It doesn't takes a lot of courage to beat up on Buddhists. Buddhists don't fight back; they pray for those who visit violence upon them. The Taliban and al Qaeda must have thought the U.S. would react the same way and turn the other cheek when their "martyrs" killed 3,000 people in attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania but was thought to have been headed to the White House. How freaking stupid are they to believe that the U.S. wouldn't find out who was behind the attack and then start dropping "Daisy Cutters" like there was no tomorrow?

We're worried about the sensitivities of the people who put out a contract to kill writer Salman Rushdie. And we're worried about the sensitivities of people who succeeded in killing a Dutch filmmaker who made a movie depicting violence against women in Islam. Why haven't there ever been any protests against the filmmaker's murder in the middle east? Or protests about the violence against women in Islamic society. That's a "dog bites man" story and would be lucky to earn three column inches in the "Fun" section of the Lower Sandusky Chronicle.

Kuwaitis didn't protest the alleged snub; they were busy celebrating the decision by that country's parliament bringing the country into the 20th Century giving women the right to vote and hold office and didn't have time to protest an alleged religious snub. But you didn't see that sign of democracy in the top news.

(By the way, congratulations to the women of Kuwait! You've come a long way baby! Jewaira, you rock! Just remember that a cigarette named "Virginia Slims" is not a torch of female freedom but a nail in your coffin. Caveat emptor.)

Now the administration is bending over backwards, apologizing to these psychotic mullahs that the desecration of the Koran is not U.S. policy. I wish the administration officials would also let these people know that private citizens in the U.S. might flush copies of the Koran -- I can just about guarantee it's going to happen -- the press will undoubtedly cover the flushing, it'll be international news once again and there's nothing the government can do about it. :P

If the Muslims respond in kind and flush copies of the Bible, some of us will bitch loudly but there won't be widespread rioting. We're not as fucking crazy about religion as Muslims apparently are. Well ... at least not those among us who don't change our names to David Koresh or Rev. Jim Jones. Most of us love and believe in God, but we don't kill people who don't ... at least not anymore. At the worst, we send people to their door at 5 o'clock Saturday mornings with pamphlets to convert them.

Maybe there isn't a federal policy of desecrating the Koran or other religious icons and texts, but the freedoms of our Constitution allow us -- as free individuals -- to stick crucifixes in jars of urine, burn flags, create "art" depicting religious scenes where the medium is feces. As individuals, we don't have to approve of these activities. And we may protest the federal funding for such disgusting things, but free people in a free country can do stuff like that -- that's the way freedom works.

Islamist extremists have been wrapping themselves in the Koran, saying the Koran is the word of Allah, and using this book and its teachings as an excuse to abuse women and torture and kill those innocents who disagree with strict Islamic law. Is it really any surprise that people might want to desecrate that item as a symbol of their disgust with the people who use the Koran for their own greed and self-interest?

When the Islamists start protesting against something that really matters, like how their psychotic mullahs convince illiterate, uneducated men and women to kill themselves so the mullahs can live well, let me know. It'll confirm that Mohammed Atta and the other 18 "martyrs" are having a game of ice hockey in hell.

---

May 15-21 is National EMS Week. Congratulations and thank you First Responders, EMTs, Paramedics and all those in the Emergency Medical Services!

---
Porn spam Easter egg of the day:

One man (or woman) with courage is a majority.-- Thomas Jefferson

4 Comments:

At 15:47, Blogger Christopher said...

That's exactly what the fuck I'm talking about!! Hell, they're better at this politics thing than we are why the fuck do we have to bend over backwards simply because we're not willing to passively accept their violence the way that they do with each other. People's religion is disrespected and violated all the time, but you do not kill innocent civilians over it!

On the other hand, however, I still do not believe with the decision to go to war as opposed to simply finding Bin Laden and dealing with the solution that way. I continue to be one of those bleeding liberals who feels that the president has his own concerns over oil, and that this is part of a bigger issue. It is good that we have Saddam, I think ... But the intimidation, really. So we had better not do anything to offend them and their religion, as if fucking 9/11 wasn't their response to being offended since the beginning of time anyway!! I mean what the hell. Whatever, the bottom line is that you cannot go around terrorizing people, and it's never ok, regardless of what political agenda that you have, or whatever religious issues that you are hiding behind. Not that we're right for the bs we've done either but you know ...

 
At 10:37, Blogger NEWS4A2, blood-sucking journalist said...

Thanks for stopping by The 6th Estate! Please tell your friends!

You made a good case but I tend to disagree with the standard liberal position. Taking out bin Laden doesn't stop terrorism. bin Laden and al Qaeda are a symptom of a problem in the middle east of religious extremism, lack of education, and dictatorships. People learn to follow the Koran and the teachings of psychotic mullahs but don't learn to question authority, secular or religious. Unless there is a solution to the root problems, there will always exist symptoms like bin Laden or al Zarqawi. It's how Adolf Hitler came to power; he portrayed himself as the solution to the problems in post-WWI Germany.

Iraq isn't about the oil. The oil is lagniappe. You should read this post. Also, Saddam was a Frankenstein we helped created as a balanced to the Iranian mullahs; it was our responsibility to take him out.

Again, thanks for the comments! Stop back when you have time; I'll be posting again!

 
At 18:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i dont mean to sound like a dick. but you need to go eat a dick dude, you dont really know what your talking about, and you sound ignorant as hell. dont blame the religion of islam over what a few people did. islam does not condon killing. killing is wrong in islam.

i read the bible, the torah and the quran, and the one that makes the most sense is the quran. many americans have a miss understanding about islam, islam is a very peaceful religion. islam is almost exactly like christianity. muslims still believe in adam and eve and noah and abraham and jesus and everything. the only difrence is that they dont belive jesus was Gods son, they dont belive god has a son or will ever have a son. they believe that God is ONE and only one. they belive that jesus was a prophet, a messenger, just like noah and abraham and moses and all the rest of the messengers. just because jesus turned water into wine and walked on water doesnt mean he is gods son. moses parted the sea, is he gods son too? god just gave them powers like that to make mericals so that people would believe them more. so yeah, what muslims believe is that jesus was gods messenger, not his son. and muslims believe that muhammad was the last messenger after jesus. muhammad was sent as a messenger to fix everything and fix the missinterpitations that people were having about jesus and thinking jesus was Gods son. so thats why christians dont know about muhammad or listen to him and didnt think of him as a prophet, because they were too busy believing jesus was gods son..dont confuse muslims with jews. jews belive that jesus was not gods son, BUT they believe gods son (the messiah) hasnt come yet, and WILL come later on..muslims believe god doesnt have a son, AND will NEVER have a son. they belive god is one, and the only one. it makes sence tho. if god has a son then that means you have to worship both God almighty (the creator), and you have to worship his son. and that is polythism. that means you pray to more than one god. isnt that wrong in christianity?

christians changed the bible soo many times, from old testament to new testament. why would christians do that? why do they want to change the word of God? do they think God is wrong? and christians can change Gods words to what every they want? it was paul who started christianity, he clamied to have met jesus when he in fact didnt..paul was born even after jesus died..theres alot of sub-catagories in christianity. like catholic and luthern and baptist and mormon, ect..each sub catagory has its own belief. is that how religion is suposed to be?

the bible has soo many contraditions too.

many people dont know that islam is actually a peacefull religon. many people think muslims have "honor killings" and kill people, when in fact they dont..in the quran, killing is WRONG, people who kill will go straight to hell. matter of fact, it is the BIBLE that aproves "honor killing". read the bible.

read leviticus 21:9
"And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire"

what does that mean? if the priests daughter commits a bad sexual act, she is to be burned because of her fathers reputation, because it is against his honor. In fact, the act is ordered by the Bible ITSELF..in the quran it doesnt say ANYTHING about honor killing. it disaproves killing at all

heres another one,

Leviticus 20:9
"For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him"

heres another one too,

Exodus 21:17
"And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death."

what does that mean?
So here the children are put to death for insulting their parents? and this is WORD-FOR-WORD what is writen in the bible. so the children are put to death for dis-honoring their very own parents and the punishment is death?.

in the bible it even says that men can sell thier daughters as slaves. here read

Exodus 21:7-8
"If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as menservants do. If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her".

There is even pre-arranged marriage before the child is even born!

christians think LESS of women, and they think women are dirty and low status.

Ecclesiasticus 22:3
"...and the birth of ANY daughter is a loss"

did you know that in christianity, if a woman gives birth to a baby boy, then she becomes unclean for 7 days. but if she gives birth to a baby girl, then she becomes unclean for 14 days.

here read it

Leviticus 12:2-5
"Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a MALE child: then she shall be unclean SEVEN DAYS; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean. And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying THIRTY THREE days; she shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be fulfilled. But if she bear a FEMALE child, then she shall be unclean TWO WEEKS, as in her separation: and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying SIXTY SIX days."

how fucked is that?

ok let see what the Quran has to say about women.

"When news is brought to one of them, of (the birth of) a female (child), his face darkens, and he is filled with inward grief! With shame does he hide himself from his people, Because of the bad news He has had! Shall he retain it On (sufferance and) contempt, Or bury it in the dust? Ah! what an evil (choice) They decide on?
(The Noble Quran, 16:58-59)"

which means just the thought and concidering the birth of a female is a bad thing, is evil by itself in the Quran..

and muslims DONT have slaves and never had slaves..it was muhammad who encouraged to end slavery. islam was the first religion to end slavery..

Muhammad said "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity (by paying his ransom)." (Quran hadith: 21:8)

the prophet muhammad even baught slaves from christians, just to free them and let them FREE after buying them..

islam ended slavery..and why would islam have slaves when one of five pillars of islam, and one of the 5 things you need to do for BEING a muslim is giving to the needy and poor which is 'Zakaat' and fasting once a month every year for ramadaan?..islam is a peaceful religion. where in the Bible does it say to fast every month, to feel the pain the poor and needy people endure. and where in the bible does it say that you have to give money to the poor?..now you tell me? which do you think is a peacful religion?

did you know that in the bible it is said that if a woman comits audulty she should be put to death?

ok lets see this from the biginning and see its contradictions..heres a simple one that everyone knows because its one of the 10 comandments..

Exodus 20:14
"You shall not commit adultery."

Deuteronomy 22:22
"If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die."

Leviticus 20:10
"If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death."

Deuteronomy 25:11-12
"If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand"

ok so now, the point is if you commit adultry you must die, right?

Matthew 19:9
"I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits ADULTERY."

ok so now wouldn't this cause the person to be put to death? because they commited adultry?

let us now look at what David did with his neighbors wife in the Bible..

"One evening David got up from his bed and walked around on the roof of the palace. From the roof he saw a woman bathing. The woman was very beautiful, and David sent someone to find out about her. The man said, 'Isn't this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam and the WIFE of Uriah the Hittite?' Then David sent messengers to get her. She came to him, and he slept with her. (She had purified herself from her uncleanness.) Then she went back home.
(From the NIV Bible, 2 Samuel 11:2-4)"

ok now lets see how David was punished..

Samuel 12:7-8
"Then Nathan said to David, "You are the man! This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'I anointed you king over Israel, and I delivered you from the hand of Saul. I gave your master's house to you, and your master's wives into your arms. I gave you the house of Israel and Judah. And if all this had been too little, I would have given you even more."

Samuel 12:12-14
"You did it in secret, but I will do this thing in broad daylight before all Israel." Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD." Nathan replied, "The LORD has taken away your sin. You are not going to die. But because by doing this you have made the enemies of the LORD show utter contempt, the son born to you will die."

do you see the contradictions in this?

look at this contradicticting verse that doesnt make sence what so ever.

Leviticus 20:21
"If a man marries his brother's wife, it is an act of impurity; he has dishonored his brother. They will be childless."

then

Deuteronomy 25:5
"If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband's brother shall take her and marry her and fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to her."

what the hell? how am i suposed to read that? thats just nonsence..marrying the brother's wife was at first forbidden and considered impure, shameful and dishonoring to the brother, and then not only it became permissible, but also mandatory in the case of death!?..

and read the end of it.."they will be childless"? would GOD Almighty really deprive the couple from having children as promised in the verse?? scientificaly that would NEVER happen, they will be pregnant, have 10 kids.. and probaly all boys since christianity HATES girls..

in the Quran, all men and women are created EQUAL. violence slavery, and inequality is WRONG, and looked down upon. we are all gods creation put on earth to live together and work together and GET TO KNOW eachother. we are not God to judge and decide who gets killed or lives..we are suposed to live together in the world and in the end, during judgment day..God decides who goes to hell or heaven, based on how we live on earth..

here is a verse in the Quran that explains the world and mankind.

"O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) [adam and eve] of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other. Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah[God allmighty] is the most righteous of you. And Allah[God allmighty] has full knowledge and is well-acquainted.
(The Noble Quran, 49:13)

When Muslims bow down to God Almighty in worship at their homes, they do not for instance bow down to the sofa, or to the pair of shoes, or to the table, or to the wall, or to the door, or to the TV, or to any object that is in front of them in their homes. They bow down to God Almighty only, regardless what's in front of them AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT WORSHIPING THAT OBJECT..the Kaaba (black cube in saudi arabia) is the same thing. they do not bow down to it in worship in any shape or form. they bow down only to God Almighty in its direction because it is His Appointed House where He symbolically meets His Servants and True Believers..

and muslims DO NOT WORSHIP the Kabba (the Black Cube in Mecca, Saudia Arabia) they just pray in that direction. The Kaaba makes the millions of Muslims all over the world Pray to God Almighty as one unified community..It maximizes the Glorification of GOD Almighty, because in the 5-daily Prayers, it is not only the individual who is Praising GOD, but also the millions of the Muslims world-wide (who are on the same time) are doing it almost simultaneously as if they were ONE CLOSE COMMUNITY..

Even Jesus, peace be upon him, bowed down to god [God Almighty] the Islamic way..

(From the NIV Bible, Matthew 26:39)
"Going a little farther, he [Jesus] fell with his face to the ground and prayed, 'My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will."

now lets talk about slavery
lets see how the Bible promotes slavery, and how they are very contradicting about "killing" slaves is ok, because they are property..

here is the first thing, very simple

Exodus 21:12 "Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death." This verse from the Bible is very straight forward. If you kill an innocent human being, then you must die.

now let us look at both
Exodus 20:13, and Deuteronomy 5:17 "You shall not murder."
Both verses have the same exact quote, and they both order not to kill normal human beings.

Let us look at
Deuteronomy 27:25
"Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person. Then all the people shall say, 'Amen!'"..This verse and the above verses so far are talking about normal human beings. They equalize between normal human beings.

Now let us look at
Exodus 21:20-21 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property."

Notice how the Bible doesn't recognize the slave male or female as a normal human being..If the master beats his servant to death, then the master will not get the death punishment or penalty..He will only be punished, but not to death. This punishment mighty be even a light one such as a single light whip since the punishment was not determined.

Let us look at
Deuteronomy 24:7
"If a man is caught kidnapping one of his brother Israelites and treats him as a slave or sells him, the kidnapper must die. You must purge the evil from among you."

This verse quite clearly states that the Israeli is better in human value than any other human being in the eyes of GOD..If an Israeli is treated as a slave, then we would have the worlds greatest problems..But however, it is ok to treat others as slaves, and to kill them too according to Exodus 21:20.

Let us look at
Leviticus 25:39
"If one of your countrymen becomes poor among you and sells himself to you, do not make him work as a slave."

This verse seems to despise the slaves by ordering people to be merciful on others from the same tribe and not to treat them bad and not to make them work as slaves. It is quite obvious that his verse doesnt believe in human equality..

ok now lets see how the bible calls slaves animals..

Let us look at
Exodus 23:12 "Six days do your work, but on the seventh day do not work, so that your ox and your donkey may rest and the slave born in your household, and the alien as well, may be refreshed."

We can obviously see from this verse that the slave and the animal have the same value..a human slave in the Bible is an animal and not a human being..This verse puts the animals and the slave in the same category..it doesn't separate them.

Leviticus 25:44-46
"Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can will them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly."

what kind of a human value does the Bible give to slaves?.if slaves and their children must be inherited and passed down to newer generations as slaves, then how in the world will they ever gain their freedom?? does the Bible believe in Freedom? Does the Bible believe in liberating human beings from slavery? apparently it does not!!!..

now lets see what it says in the Quran, to do..and its very simple..the Prophet Muhammad said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity (by paying his ransom)." (Quran hadith: 21:8)

one of the Five pillars of ISLAM is 'Zakaat', which is giving money to the poor. another pillar of islam is Fasting during the month of ramadaan, fasting is a way for muslims to feel the pain that slaves and poor people endure, and encourges muslims to give money and food to the poor..

Islam came to liberate slaves and end the Judeo-Christian and Pagan slavery, and how the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments promotes slavery..Slavery is the back bone of Christianity..just RECENTLY Christianity ended Slavery, while Muslims ended slavery loong during the phrophets days..

The bottom line is that in order for the Muslims to remain as a purified and GOD Almighty-fearing and obeying society, one of the requirements that they had to accomplish was to gradually and completely ELIMINATE slavery, the same slavery that was at its peak during the Jews' , Christians' and Pagans' times..

bottom line is. islam doesnt condon slavery. islam doesnt condone beating thier women and it doesnt condone "honor killings" like the bible does, and its sure as hell doesnt condone ANY sort of killing of people who dont follow the religion. dont blame the religon of islam for the actions of a few muslims, who probably miss interpreted the quran.

anyway, sorry if my response sounds harsh, if your offended im really sorry. my intension wasnt to put down the christian religion. i was just trying to state the contradictions in the bible that people are blind to see. people who point fingers at other religions and judge without reading or learning about it, and without reading thier own. so, the point i was trying to make was that christians who point fingers at other religions really need to look at thier own. sorry i ended up rambling on and on, and got alittle carried away.

and by the way goofy328, 9/11 was done the bush administration, not by "bin laden". bush knew exactly where bin laden was the week of 9/11, and he knows where he is to this day. bin laden was in dubai having surgery the day of 9/11, he was even being escorted by US government officials to his operation. bin laden even came on al-jazeera news and said he had nothing to do with 9/11.

people are soo stupid and ignorant to see that 9/11 was done by the bush administration, under the UN charter act bush couldnt go into iraq, and what he did was ILLEGAL. the US needed something big to happen in the US like a terrorist attack, so that bush can pass the PATRIOT ACT, which lets the US fight terrorism home and ABROAD..Bush said Iraq had Weapons Of Mass Destruction, he kept claiming iraq did when in fact he KNEW iraq DIDNT..in the end the US went into iraq and DID NOT find WMDs!! they killed saddam and his sons(which is a good thing)..and now the US are STILL in iraq, for what? for oil? why is the oil prices still high in the US when they have access to all that oil? they are keeping the oil and raising the prices to make more MONEY. why doesnt the american public question the US government?

its fucked up to see a leader like that, kill his own country men for some resourses that his country doesnt have, or for a few billion dollars, it shows how corupt the US government is..but like krushchev said in the 1960s "america will destroy itself from with in" i guess that time was 9/11..

9/11 was the day the US government fucked the american people.

you americans think its wrong to question the government, and it unpatriotic to question the government..and that its unpatriotic to not stand by your president and and government..

you americans dont understand that patriotism means to stand by your country, not stand by your president, and standing by your country doesnt mean standing buy your president..presidents come and go, there will be corupt, greedy, power hungry and money hungry presidents..and thoes poeple will do anything to get what they want, including killing people..they dont care about the welfare of people..even "religous" conservative republican people like George W. Bush..

i truely feel sorry for you, and i feel sorry for many americans like you..you were brainwashed, you were just another one of bushs puppets..you believed EXACTLY what bush wanted the american public to believe..and he did it by the media and by his stupid public speaking speeches he gave..like "every nation in every region now has a decision to make. either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists" and shit like "bring them on!"..

americans dont see that presidents lie, presidents and lawyers are known to be the BIGGEST liars in the world..

i just wish you americans understand that patriotism means to stand by your COUNTRY not stand by your PRESIDENT. you dont know what patriotism even if it kicked you in the ass.

ron paul and obamas pastor, jeramiah whright, are the two people who really knew the truth behind 9/11 and really questioned the government..and what happend to them? obama stoped going to the pastor jeramiagh wrights sermons because he believed it would be bad for his reputation when running for office as president, he even called him crazy, and so did other people too. most people stoped going to his sermons..eventually he went on national tv and apologized...and what happened when ron paul tried to expose everything and questioned the government? he lost alot of the majoraty of his voters..and people ended up no liking him, and end he ended up being one of the first to drop out of the 2008 election. you see, the american people dont like to know the truth, and they dont like to know that thier government are the bad people..and they dont someone telling them. the public just doesnt care about what the truth is and whoever hates the government hates america, and they dont want to associate or have anything to do with people who hate america..the bush administration is hiding something and is not telling the people the truth. the truth that the american people NEED to know is that iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. a year after 9/11 north korea admitted to have Weapons of mass destruction..why didnt the US bomb and invade north korea? why was bush soo stuck on thinking iraq had WMDs when he knew they didnt..the majoraty of the american people are too fucking lazy, they dont want to ask questions or think or do any research. it is obvious even by just looking at the video of the twin towers colapsing. you can tell just by seeing how fast is colapsed..it colapsed in 10 seconds. you can tell it was done by controled demolition. have you ever seen a building being demolished at a construction site? they colapse that fast, by putting dynamite on the bases on each floor. it is impossible for the towers to go down that fast from a plane hitting it. only an idiot would believe that, and it is phyisically impossible for steel buildings to collapse from fire. no steel structure in the history of the world has ever fell from fire..there was a building in Madrid Spain that burned for 24 hours, and it never colapsed..the 50 story skyscraper was burned from top to bottom and it never collapsed. There was also a building in pennsylvania that burned for many hours and never fell. and just like many people i tried to explain this to, your gonna tell me jet fuel caused the plane to colapse that fast? lol jet fuel, thats a good one. jet fuel can only burn at 1800F degrees in PERFECT conditions. The steel (was tested by UL) that the twin towers were made from were made to withstand a fire that burned at 2800F degrees for 6 hours..so there, i debunked that. if you look at the video of the WTC colapsing again and the close up videos of it, you will see molten metal pouring of of the window..that molten metal came from Thermate A CONTROL DEMOLITION tool used to cut through structural steel like a hot knife through butter. it is acombination of Aluminium Oxide,Iron,Sulfur,and Manginesse. When combined the chemical reaction creates extreme heat making it able to cut steel. The 911 Commission touched briefly on the subject,. Stating that the molten material was the melted "Aluminium frame of the plane" that hit the Towers..in reality when you melt Aluminium it looks silver kind of like Mercury. It does not glow bright red or orange as does steel..steel melts at 2750 degrees franhite, amd jet fuel burns at a MAXIMUM of 1800 degrees faranhite..so the only way the twin towers could have colapsed that fast was from controled demolition..not from jetfule from a plane crash..a plane could have never took thoes towers down that fast..plus, in the 1940s a plane crashed into the empire state building, a US military b-25 bomber plane because the pilot couldnt see through the fog..there was only a hole in the side of the building..the building never colapsed..and the world trade center was built with even stronger steel than the empire state building, it was made to withstand fires and huricanes and strong windes and even plane crashes..bush fucked the american people with his lies and cover ups and everything he did..one day, hopefully, bush will admit to what he did..even if bush doesnt admit to it, hopefully the government will, and apologize..untill then the american people will continue to blame other people who had nothing to do with it..

 
At 08:43, Blogger NEWS4A2, blood-sucking journalist said...

Well District Dick, there's always Haldol, Benadryl and Ativan for what ails ya! We in the medical business call it a B-52. We use it on schizophrenics who have been non-compliant with their meds!

Thanks for stopping by! Next time you orbit my planet, keep on orbiting!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home